<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Spam Cryer &#187; Research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thespamcryer.com/category/research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thespamcryer.com</link>
	<description>Intelligent Discussion on Anti-Spam</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 15:58:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>More Spam Expected From Google and Microsoft</title>
		<link>http://www.thespamcryer.com/more-spam-expected-from-google-and-microsoft/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thespamcryer.com/more-spam-expected-from-google-and-microsoft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 17:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lead Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAPTCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAPTCHA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optrical Character Recognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spammers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thespamcryer.com/?p=71</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No I don’t mean that Google and Microsoft have started to spam people though I do certainly get a lot of messages from both of them.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No I don’t mean that Google and Microsoft have started to spam people though I do certainly get a lot of messages from both of them.</p>
<p>What I mean is that the Spammers have reportedly broken the tools deployed by the online giants Google and Microsoft to stop spammers from trading on the good name (and thus reputation) of the large farms of mail servers hosted by these two companies.</p>
<p>They have to have 100’s if not 1,000’s of mail servers under their control to be able to offer the gmail and live e-mail experience to their customers and you can almost hear the splash of saliva hitting the floor as the spammers work hard to get access to all this e-mail delivery power.</p>
<p>These two Internet Giants had issues a while ago with spammers breaking the CAPTCA technology using automatic Optical Character Recognition (OCR) or farming it out to real humans so they had implemented additional controls in the ongoing escalation on the war on spam.</p>
<p>CAPTCHAs (Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart) are those images with the distorted or obscured letters that computers are not so good at figuring out but which are a snap for a human.</p>
<p>As long as there is an economic incentive to send spam the spammers will have the money to either research better tools to recognize the images or will just farm it out to real people who are willing to work for a few cents per image or even for free if you make it part of a game or required to sign up for something people want like a ‘free’ ring-tone of the latest band.</p>
<p>More details on the Register’s website.</p>
<p><a title="Captcha Break" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/10/03/captcha_break/" target="_blank">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/10/03/captcha_break/ </a></p>
<p>- The Spam Cryer</p>
<p>Here are some more Blog articles on CAPTCHA Spam:</p>
<table style="BORDER-RIGHT: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #000000 1px solid" border="0" cellpadding="5" bgcolor="#efefef">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<ul>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.jgadgets.com/2008/10/08/filter-out-nighttime-spam-with-the-dream-captcha" target="_blank">Filter Out Nighttime Spam With The Dream CAPTCHA</a></li>
<p>- If this sounds like you, then it might be time to invest in a Dream Captcha. Yes, it’s an awful play on words, but you have to admit that it’s still pretty amusing. It almost makes you wonder how long it would take someone to get if &#8230;</p>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.proprofs.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=19341" target="_blank">What Happened Today &#8211; An Update</a></li>
<p>- Captcha spam prevention system is updated. Advaned Captcha is enabled. A new set of fonts and background images have been installed as well. Overall system has been improved and updated XML files have been installed. &#8230;</p>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/tzink/archive/2008/10/06/a-captcha-that-beats-bots-and-spammers.aspx" target="_blank">A CAPTCHA that beats bots and spammers</a></li>
<p>- A coworker came across the following CAPTCHA. Finally, one that can beat spammers and their bots! image.</p>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.remoteantispam.com/blog/index.php/2008/10/06/the-end-for-webmail/" target="_blank">The End for Webmail?</a></li>
<p>- Once penetrated these bots proceed to create several accounts, and then use them to send high volumes of spam messages. Both Microsoft and Google responded by strengthening their CAPTCHA systems, but it seems that the spammers have &#8230;</p>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.techsupportforum.com/security-center/computer-security-news/298750-spam-swine-break-next-gen-captchasspammers-have-reportedly-defeated-revised-captchas.html" target="_blank">Spam swine break next-gen CAPTCHAsSpammers have reportedly &#8230;</a></li>
<p>- Spam-tools scumbags behind the XRumer utility boast their application can defeat improved CAPTCHA controls deployed by both Hotmail and Google in response to earlier cracks, according to reports in the blogosphere. &#8230;</p>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.geekmum.com.au/2008/10/08/paying-for-obscene-spam/" target="_blank">Paying for obscene spam.</a></li>
<p>- I do get spam from other sites I own, even those with captcha systems to validate input. But none of them receive the obcene spam I get from the work from home keywords. Would love to know what others are experiencing.</p>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://gizmodo.com/5060036/dream-captcha-type-the-characters-you-see-here-for-nightmare-protection" target="_blank">Dream Captcha: Type The Characters You See Here For Nightmare &#8230;</a></li>
<p>- Spam bots deserve every nightmare. Jeffrey Augustine&#8217;s Dream Captcha updates a familiar faux-cultural symbol with the security layer consumers expect from their nocturnal hallucination protection device. &#8230;</p>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://scforum.info/index.php/topic,1870.msg2657.html#msg2657" target="_blank">Spam swine break next-gen CAPTCHAs</a></li>
<p>- Spammers have reportedly defeated revised CAPTCHAs from both Google and Microsoft. Worse, miscreants intent on establishing online webmail accounts to bombard us all with useless stock tip&#8230;</p>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.locationlohan.com/index.php?showtopic=17738" target="_blank">Spam Bots Deleted!</a></li>
<p>- Apparently, the spam bots are getting smarter and were able to bypass the captcha system for IPB. Due to this, IPB released an update (2.3.6). However, this version wasn&#8217;t installed until just recently meaning some of the bots got in. &#8230;</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p align="left"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=More+Spam+Expected+From+Google+and+Microsoft+http://tinyurl.com/2786oct" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.thespamcryer.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter-big4.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thespamcryer.com/more-spam-expected-from-google-and-microsoft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If Your e-mail Address Starts With A You Get 10% More Spam!</title>
		<link>http://www.thespamcryer.com/if-your-e-mail-address-starts-with-a-you-get-10-more-spam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thespamcryer.com/if-your-e-mail-address-starts-with-a-you-get-10-more-spam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lead Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zebras and aardvarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thespamcryer.com/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An interesting article that analyzed spam sent to both real and fake e-mail addresses over an 8 week period which shows that e-mail accounts that start with some letters get more spam than others. (Aardvarks vs. Zebra in the article).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting article that analyzed spam sent to both real and fake e-mail addresses over an 8 week period which shows that e-mail accounts that start with some letters get more spam than others. (Aardvarks vs. Zebra in the article).</p>
<p>This makes sense as some names are more popular and thus easier for the spammers to guess. I happen to know lots of people – 10+ with the first name ‘Scott’ (one is my brother) but none that have the first name Zeus. There is an interesting graph in the PDF on page 2 that shows both the amount of spam and ham and then the ratio between them for different letters of the alphabet. What does your e-mail address start with?</p>
<p>This only reinforces what I have felt all along that some people are more popular spam targets than others.</p>
<p><a title="Zebgras And Aardvarks" href="http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2008/08/25/zebras-and-aardvarks/" target="_blank">http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2008/08/25/zebras-and-aardvarks/</a></p>
<p>- Shaun</p>
<p><strong>Here are some more articles on the study (including the original):</strong></p>
<table style="BORDER-RIGHT: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #000000 1px solid" border="0" cellpadding="5" bgcolor="#efefef">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<ul>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2008/08/25/zebras-and-aardvarks/" target="_blank">Zebras and Aardvarks</a></li>
<p>- However, if one only considers “real” aardvarks and zebras, viz: where a particular email address was legitimate enough to receive some non-spam email, then the picture changes. If one treats an email address as “real” if there’s one &#8230;</p>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://community.zdnet.co.uk/blog/0,1000000567,10009100o-2000331828b,00.htm" target="_blank">Does it matter if you are an aardvark or a zebra?</a></li>
<p>- According to Cambridge University security expert Richard Clayton, if your email address is aardvark@animal.net, you are more likely to receive spam than if your address is zebra@animal.net. &#8220;It makes quite a big diff&#8230;</p>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.curiousread.com/2008/08/does-my-name-affect-how-much-spam-i-get.html" target="_blank">Does my name affect how much spam I get?</a></li>
<p>- There is, he says, a genuine statistical divide between what he calls &#8220;aardvarks&#8221; &#8211; those high up the alphabetical food chain &#8211; and &#8220;zebras&#8221; &#8211; who graze at the bottom of the dictionary. For those weary of it, he even suggests changing &#8230;</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p align="left"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=If+Your+e-mail+Address+Starts+With+A+You+Get+10%25+More+Spam...+http://tinyurl.com/2u3hxs8" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.thespamcryer.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter-big4.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thespamcryer.com/if-your-e-mail-address-starts-with-a-you-get-10-more-spam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TechRepublic &#8211; &#8220;Storm Worm: The Energizer Bunny of Botnets&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.thespamcryer.com/techrepublic-storm-worm-the-energizer-bunny-of-botnets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thespamcryer.com/techrepublic-storm-worm-the-energizer-bunny-of-botnets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 16:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Botnets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulletins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attachment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyberthreats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Kassner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viruses And Worms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thespamcryer.com/?p=35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apart from a great title this is a very interesting read on what the Storm Worm is up to these days. - Shaun Original article: http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/networking/?p=620&#38;tag=nl.e102 In the world of botnets, Storm isn’t king anymore, but Storm’s botnet owners aren’t giving up. This article is a reminder by Michael Kassner of the need to remain [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="entry">Apart from a great title this is a very interesting read on what the Storm Worm is up to these days.</div>
<p>- Shaun</p>
<p class="entry">Original article: <a title="Storm Worm: The energizer Bunny of Botnets&quot;" href="http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/networking/?p=620&amp;tag=nl.e102" target="_blank">http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/networking/?p=620&amp;tag=nl.e102</a></p>
<p class="entry"><em>In the world of botnets, Storm isn’t king anymore, but Storm’s botnet owners aren’t giving up. This article is a reminder by Michael Kassner of the need to remain vigilant and not fall prey to the Storm worm or its relatives. </em></p>
<p class="entry">——————————————————————————————————————-</p>
<p class="entry"><img src="http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/tr/Mugshots/NewsletterMugs110-85/Kassner_Michael_85-110.jpg" border="0" alt="" hspace="5" width="85" height="110" align="right" />It appears that the Storm worm is making a comeback. I first made mention of this botnet maker in the article “<a href="http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/networking/?p=482" target="_blank">Kraken: The biggest, baddest botnet yet</a>“, where I explained how <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Storm_botnet" target="_blank">Storm</a> was losing its grip as being the largest botnet in history to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kracken" target="_blank">Kraken</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Srizbi_botnet" target="_blank">Srizbi</a> as the second largest. Well, Storm developers have added a few new twists to their arsenal and are seeing a resurgence in the size of their botnets. Therefore it’s very important to not become complacent about this type of malware as it relies on social engineering to propagate. I’d like to take a few moments to go over the process so we’re all clear on how the infestation occurs.</p>
<p class="entry"><strong>How my computer became a zombie</strong></p>
<p class="entry">Let’s follow the process of becoming infected with Storm and the after-effects:</p>
<div class="entry">
<ol>
<li>I receive an e-mail informing me that the attachment contains some very important information. Not knowing any better, I open the attachment.</li>
<li>I was just conned, the attachment has the Storm trojan/bot client hiding in it. My computer is now infected and just became part of a botnet. The scary part is that this all happened without my knowing it.</li>
<li>What’s worse is that my AV application is useless as Storm’s code changes constantly, so any AV signature is out-of date within an hour.</li>
<li>My computer now follows the bidding of the “botmaster,” which normally means it’s going to be used to as a spam relay. There are other more malicious activities such as “<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denial-of-service_attack">distributed denial of service attacks</a>” but botnets are usually for hire and spamming is a lucrative business.</li>
</ol>
</div>
<p>That’s one scenario and as botnet malware matures other more sophisticated attack venues are introduced. For instance, the delivery mechanism used by the Storm worm changes regularly. It starts out as PDF spam progressing to links for e-cards or invites to Web sites. The worm developers will try any method possible to entice users to click on a phony link or attachment. The initial e-mail used by Storm also morphs. There are new subject lines and body text that refer to relevant news or issues — any way to subjugate human nature.</p>
<p>The willingness to prey on human nature is why Storm is back in the news. It’s propagating successfully using an e-mail with a subject line of “<a href="http://www.ic3.gov/media/2008/080730.aspx">FBI may strike Facebook” or “The FBI has a new way of tracking Facebook</a>.” It appears that once again the developers have touched on a chord of human nature and are getting a decent infection rate.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Final thoughts</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong></p>
<p>I could spend all sorts of time on the intricacies of how each of the top three botnets work or how successful they are at evading detection, but that wouldn’t help. This article is my regular attempt at making sure all of us are cognizant of the need to be web-savvy, always questioning whether that link or an attachment makes sense. Doing so will go a long way to reducing the amount of spam we receive. This certainly includes me, as I’ve been very close to becoming an unwilling botnet member myself.</p>
<p>——————————————————————————————————————-</p>
<p><em>Michael Kassner has been involved with wireless communications for 40 plus years, starting with amateur radio (K0PBX) and now as a network field engineer and independent wireless consultant. Current certifications include Cisco ESTQ Field Engineer, CWNA, and CWSP. </em></p>
<p>Here are more Blog articles on the Storm Worm:</p>
<table style="BORDER-RIGHT: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #000000 1px solid" border="0" cellpadding="5" bgcolor="#efefef">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<ul>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.sudosecure.net/archives/264" target="_blank">Storm Worm &#8211; Go away, we’re not home</a></li>
<p>- In the last few weeks I have received several requests for information regarding the Storm Worm. So today I thought I would perform an analysis in my lab on the last Storm Binary (postcard.exe) I retrieved using my Storm Binary Tracking &#8230;</p>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/10/the_storm_worm.html" target="_blank">The Storm Worm</a></li>
<p>- The Storm worm first appeared at the beginning of the year, hiding in e-mail attachments with the subject line: &#8220;230 dead as storm batters Europe.&#8221; Those who opened the attachment became infected, their computers joining an ever-growing &#8230;</p>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-10002760-83.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news" target="_blank">FBI warns of new Storm worm variant</a></li>
<p>- E-mail pretending to contain information on a fictitious FBI vs. Facebook case contains malicious code for the Storm worm botnet.</p>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.fbi.gov/pressrel/pressrel08/stormworm073008.htm" target="_blank">Beware of New E-Mail Scam Spreading Storm Worm Virus</a></li>
<p>- The FBI and its partner, the Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3), have received reports of recent spam e-mails spreading the Storm Worm malicious software, known as malware. These e-mails direct recipients to click on a link to view &#8230;</p>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/over-80-percent-of-storm-worm-spam-sent.html" target="_blank">Over 80 percent of Storm Worm Spam Sent by Pharmaceutical Spam Kings</a></li>
<p>- I can barely see anything around me due to all the smoke coming from the smoking guns of who&#8217;s what, what&#8217;s when, and who&#8217;s done what with who, especially in respect to Storm Worm whose multitasking on different fronts in the first &#8230;</p>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/storm-worms-lazy-summer-campaigns.html" target="_blank">Storm Worm&#8217;s Lazy Summer Campaigns</a></li>
<p>- The Storm Worm-ers seem to be lacking their usual creativity in respect to the usual social engineering attacks taking advantage of the momentum we&#8217;re used to seeing. These days they&#8217;re not piggybacking on real news items, &#8230;</p>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://honeyblog.org/archives/196-Interesting-Pattern-in-Storm-Worm-Traffic.html" target="_blank">Interesting Pattern in Storm Worm Traffic</a></li>
<p>- In addition, an IP address related to the University of California in San Diego (UCSD) sticks out, presumably related to their Storm Worm research. I&#8217;m not yet sure what all the other IP addresses mean, but presumably all of them are &#8230;</p>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.myfoxtwincities.com/myfox/pages/News/Detail?contentId=7098640&amp;version=1&amp;locale=EN-US&amp;layoutCode=TSTY&amp;pageId=3.2.1" target="_blank">FBI vs Facebook Email Thread Has &#8216;Storm Worm&#8217; Virus</a></li>
<p>- The FBI is warning email users of spam email which mentions a link to an FBI vs Facebook news article. Once the user clicks on the link, the Storm Worm malware is downloaded to the Internet-connected device&#8230;</p>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.technewsreview.com.au/article.php?article=5550" target="_blank">FBI warns of new Storm Worm attacks</a></li>
<p>- A rash of complaints prompted the FBI to issue a warning of a new round of spam e-mails bombarding the Internet to spread the malicious Storm Worm.</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p align="left"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=TechRepublic+%E2%80%93+%E2%80%9CStorm+Worm%3A+The+Energizer+Bunny+of+Botnets...+http://tinyurl.com/269uj7f" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.thespamcryer.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter-big4.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thespamcryer.com/techrepublic-storm-worm-the-energizer-bunny-of-botnets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update of the McAfee S.P.A.M Experiment</title>
		<link>http://www.thespamcryer.com/update-of-the-mcafee-spam-experiment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thespamcryer.com/update-of-the-mcafee-spam-experiment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 21:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CudaMail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti Spam Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McAfee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S.P.A.M. experiment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thespamcryer.com/?p=4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While McAfee is supposed to release the full report today one mother of three named Tracey Mooney has already talked to Network World and given her version of the experience of being deliberately naive on the Internet for a month. The outcome?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hear ye, Hear ye!<a title="Network World: Tracy Mooney" href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/070108-mcafee-spam-experiment.html?page=1" target="_blank"><img class="alignright" style="margin: 0.3px; float: right;" src="http://www.networkworld.com/graphics/ab5_images/070108-mooney-pic.jpg" alt="Network World: Tracy Mooney" width="84" height="108" /></a></p>
<p>While [tag]McAfee[/tag] is supposed to release the full report today one mother of three named Tracey Mooney has already talked to Network World and given her version of the experience of being deliberately naive on the Internet for a month.</p>
<p>The outcome?</p>
<p>Tracey is quoted as being ‘Horrified’ at the ‘snake oil’ and ‘true junk’ she received in her inbox. Over the course of the month she received her share of the 23,233 SPAM messages sent to the 5 US based participants and even her snail mail box started filling up with the offers for things like a Credit Card with a $7,500 limit in the name of her alias &#8216;Penelope Retch&#8217;. The PC’s used were clogged up with malware and as a result were noticeably slower. I think I predicted this outcome when we first heard of this experiment.</p>
<p><strong>Network World article:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a title="Network World " href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/070108-mcafee-spam-experiment.html?page=1" target="_blank">www.networkworld.com/news/2008/070108-mcafee-spam-experiment.html?page=1</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>McAfee S.P.A.M. site:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a title="The S.P.A.M. Experiment" href="http://www.mcafeespamexperiment.com" target="_blank">www.mcafeespamexperiment.com</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Our Predictions:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a title="CudaMail Blog: My Predictions on McAfee's Global 'Spammed Persistently All Month' or S.P.A.M. Experiment" href="http://www.cudamail.com/blog/2008/04/10/MyPredictionsOnMcAfeesGlobalSpammedPersistentlyAllMonthOrSPAMExperiment.aspx" target="_blank">www.cudamail.com/blog/2008/04/10/MyPredictionsOnMcAfeesGlobalSpammedPersistentlyAllMonthOrSPAMExperiment.aspx</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>So what is the word to the wise?</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>If it sounds too good to be true it probably is.</li>
<li>Don’t click on unsolicited links in e-mail as you will probably get infected and have to wipe your PC and start over wasting your valuable time.</li>
<li>Use a good anti-spam service such as <a title="CudaMail Anti-Spam Hosted Service" href="http://www.CudaMail.com" target="_blank">[tag]CudaMai[/tag]l</a> that focuses on keeping the false positives to a minimum while still blocking 95% or more of the spam.</li>
<li>Keep your desktop anti-malware protection up to date.</li>
<li>Do regular backups for when you do get infected and have to start over.</li>
<li>Download and apply the patches for your Operating system (XP, Vista and even Linux!) and programs on a regular, at least monthly, basis.</li>
</ol>
<p>Play safe out there on the Internet!</p>
<p>- Shaun</p>
<p align="left"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Update+of+the+McAfee+S.P.A.M+Experiment+http://tinyurl.com/26nlfab" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.thespamcryer.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter-big4.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thespamcryer.com/update-of-the-mcafee-spam-experiment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
